Ensign Looking to Leave Troop-Contributing Allies Out to Dry on Peacekeeping Funds

By Scott PaulSeptember 6, 20072 min read

Originally published on the CGS blog on September 6, 2007.

Senator John Ensign just proposed a major cut to U.S. contributions to UN peacekeeping on the Senate floor.

Just last month, with strong U.S. support, the UN Security Council
authorized a peacekeeping mission to Darfur. It’s the largest, most
expensive mission ever, and it’s coming together now in a very
promising way. The new mission’s establishment means that half of all
UN peacekeeping dollars are going to Sudan. It’s very simple: if we cut
funds for U.N. peacekeeping, we are leaving victims in Sudan (not to
mention 17 other countries that depend on the blue helmets) out to dry .

But that’s not all: by not paying our peacekeeping dues in full, we
also irritate troop contributing nations – close allies all – who put
their people in harm’s way with the expectation that they will get
paid. Here’s a list of countries and the amount (U.S. dollars) that
they are owed, courtesy of the Better World Campaign:

Bangladesh 77,082,065
India 56,629,046
Kenya 55,020,550
Pakistan 49,689,151
Jordan 29,440,123
Nepal 17,263,828
Italy 15,292,565
France 14,250,191
Chile 13,788,618
Australia 13,182,030
China 10,532,743
Argentina 10,087,173
Indonesia 9,357,385
Uruguay 9,139,317
Germany 8,481,133
Ghana 8,154,489
Brazil 7,210,090

We’re already hundreds of millions of dollars behind on peacekeeping
payments. With one roll call vote, the Senate can dismiss our
international obligations, jeopardize the lives of innocent civilians
around the world, and kick our closest allies in the teeth. Here’s
hoping Ensign doesn’t get his way.

— Scott Paul

Update: Thankfully, the Ensign amendment failed overwhelmingly on a vote of 30-63. The roll call is here.
Biggest surprise: Senator Sam Brownback, one of the most outspoken
advocates for international help in Darfur, voted for the amendment.
What’s more, he and the other 29 who supported the amendment did so
despite opposition from President Bush, Minority Leader Mitch
McConnell, and almost all of the senior Republicans on relevant
committees and subcommittees (Lugar, Hagel, Gregg, Cochran, Lugar,
Hagel, Warner).

Opinions expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the positions of Citizens for Global Solutions.

Get global solutions in your inbox

CGS eNews brings our reporting, analysis and campaign news straight to you.

Subscribe to eNews