This site makes extensive use of JavaScript, for the best browsing experience we recommend you enable JavaScript in your browser.
World Climate Change to be Independently Analyzed
Last week the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) held a meeting in Antalya, Turkey where world weather agencies agreed to compile data from around the world and allow independent scrutiny of the raw figures. The UK Met Office put forward the "grand challenge" proposal which was accepted by 150 delegates from around the world. The details will be agreed upon at a conference to be held in Britain later this year.
The Met Office proposal explains that this "effort will ensure that the datasets are completely robust and that all methods are transparent" The proposal additionally states that "any such analysis does not undermine the existing independent datasets that all reflect a warming trend."
The proposal aims to have the entire global record of land-based air temperatures from 5,000 weather stations available to anyone. Several groups of scientists working independently in different countries will re-examine millions of observations, dating back to before 1860. The methods of the scientific groups will also be made transparent and open to scrutiny. The task is expected to take three years.
The Met Office stated that current measurements were "fundamentally ill-conditioned to answer 21st-century questions, such as how extremes are changing, and therefore what adaptation and mitigation decisions should be taken."
The new agreement came about amidst criticism that climate change data had been exaggerated in recent documents. Scientists and other climate specialists said the WMO has been trying to enhance data collection for years. Interestingly they said that it took a persistent campaign by opponents of climate change to take the issue more seriously.

To learn more about climate change CLICK HERE
Support Stronger Legislation to Combat Global Warming CLICK HERE
About the author
Veronica Glick
Former Research Associate
Topics
- Arms Control (21)
- Become a Member (8)
- Capitol Hill (182)
- CGS Political Action Committee (PAC) (14)
- Chapters (5)
- Civilian Protection (211)
- Climate Change (83)
- Comprehensive Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) (3)
- Congressional Report Card (9)
- Current Campaigns (8)
- Election News & Analysis (103)
- Fellows (2)
- Gender Based Violence (21)
- Genocide Prevention (172)
- Get Involved (70)
- Home (4)
- Human Rights (274)
- Human Rights Council (50)
- International Criminal Court (312)
- International Criminal Justice (74)
- Law & Justice (319)
- Law of the Sea Treaty (59)
- Nuclear Disarmament (81)
- Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) (3)
- Other (44)
- PAC: 2010 Election Endorsements (3)
- Partners for Global Change (3)
- Peacekeeping (154)
- Prevent War (200)
- Rights of the Child Treaty (11)
- Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) (23)
- Support Us (7)
- Take Action (36)
- Tax Deductible Giving (3)
- UN Funding (118)
- UN Reform & Revitalization (52)
- United Nations (398)
- usaforicc.org (2)
- WFI (2)
- Women's Rights Treaty (CEDAW) (51)
Archive
- May 2012 (24)
- April 2012 (36)
- March 2012 (34)
- February 2012 (24)
- January 2012 (30)
- December 2011 (36)
- November 2011 (64)
- October 2011 (38)
- September 2011 (40)
- August 2011 (36)
- July 2011 (62)
- June 2011 (66)









Comments
Please note the wording in
Submitted by Walter Royal on May 2, 2011 - 7:50pm.
Please note the wording in this quote from the article.
"The Met Office proposal explains that this "effort will ensure that the datasets are completely robust and that all methods are transparent" The proposal additionally states that "any such analysis does not undermine the existing independent datasets that all reflect a warming trend.""
This part of the article clearly states that any new data will not be allowed to change the conclusions that they have already decided on from the previous study. In other words they are doing all of this work to make the opposition to their agenda relax so they can slide this crap by and get their way no matter what we want.