This site makes extensive use of JavaScript, for the best browsing experience we recommend you enable JavaScript in your browser.
U.S. to Participate in Preparations for the U.N. Durban II Conference
We were thrilled to hear that this April the Obama Administration will be sending a delegation to represent the United States at a preparatory meeting for the United Nations Durban Review Conference in Geneva, Switzerland. The Durban II Conference will review the commitments established by each country in the original U.N. World Conference Against Racism held in Durban, in 2001. In 2001, the United States led a walkout of the Durban Conference because of the anti-Jewish and anti-Israel message that dominated the conference. Others already fear a repeat in Durban II because anti-Israeli states like Iran have played such a large role in the Conference's preparations. The outcome document of the original Conference includes recently added language impugning the state of Israel. A friend of
Citizens for Global Solutions, Congressman Howard L. Berman, Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, echoed our sentiments when he stated,
"The decision to engage in, rather than to withdraw from, the debate in Geneva is constructive, it is critical that the United States regain its moral voice at the U.N. by jumping into the fray and stipulating clear redlines for re-focusing Durban II, including the removal of language in the Outcome Document attacking Israel or singling it out for criticism. We should continue challenging the status quo at the U.N. by re-engaging in and restructuring its human rights mechanisms in order to break the choke-hold that non-democratic states currently have on them."
In September 2008, Berman authored a House Resolution (H.R. 1361) that urged the Bush Administration to get involved in the Durban II Conference. Now we are so pleased to see his good work come to fruition. Canada has stated that they will not be attending and France and the Netherlands are considering not attending. Whether or not U.S. participation will be able to make a difference is unclear but even if the U.S. is forced to walk out, our presence in Conference preparations will send a message. "By standing up to those who are trying to hijack the proceedings, and by telling them that we refuse to accept outright anti-Semitism or an attempt to single out Israel in the context of a racism conference" stated Berman, "we are reasserting our moral leadership in world affairs".
About the author
Topics
- Arms Control (21)
- Become a Member (8)
- Capitol Hill (180)
- CGS Political Action Committee (PAC) (14)
- Chapters (5)
- Civilian Protection (211)
- Climate Change (83)
- Comprehensive Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) (3)
- Congressional Report Card (9)
- Current Campaigns (8)
- Election News & Analysis (103)
- Fellows (2)
- Gender Based Violence (21)
- Genocide Prevention (172)
- Get Involved (70)
- Home (4)
- Human Rights (274)
- Human Rights Council (50)
- International Criminal Court (312)
- International Criminal Justice (74)
- Law & Justice (319)
- Law of the Sea Treaty (59)
- Nuclear Disarmament (81)
- Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) (3)
- Other (44)
- PAC: 2010 Election Endorsements (3)
- Partners for Global Change (3)
- Peacekeeping (154)
- Prevent War (200)
- Rights of the Child Treaty (11)
- Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) (23)
- Support Us (7)
- Take Action (36)
- Tax Deductible Giving (3)
- UN Funding (118)
- UN Reform & Revitalization (52)
- United Nations (398)
- usaforicc.org (2)
- WFI (2)
- Women's Rights Treaty (CEDAW) (51)
Archive
- May 2012 (22)
- April 2012 (36)
- March 2012 (34)
- February 2012 (24)
- January 2012 (30)
- December 2011 (36)
- November 2011 (64)
- October 2011 (38)
- September 2011 (40)
- August 2011 (36)
- July 2011 (62)
- June 2011 (66)







