![]() |
More Information on US Policy on the ICC
The Bush
Administration has taken a strong position against the
ICC, has withdrawn from all negotiations, and has pursued policies that
could undermine the Court's important work. This staunch
opposition is despite the fact that
the U.S. played a leading role in negotiating the Rome Statute, the
treaty establishing the ICC.
+
BUSH ADM. POLICY STATEMENTS ON THE ICC
- Bilateral Immunity Agreements
(so-called "Article 98 Agreements")
- Country by Country BIA Status PDF Format
- NEW! Total Military Aid Cut to ICC Member States for Fiscal Year 2005 PDF Format
- NEW! U.S. Recognizes Counterproductive BIA Policy
HTML Format | PDF Format - The Nethercutt Provision: Cutting Off Our Nose to Spite Our Face PDF Format
- US Institutes More Sanctions on ICC Member States: The Nethercutt
Provision in the Foreign Operations Appropriations Bill
FY2006 (HTML Format )
FY2007 (coming soon) - High Costs: Threatened Military and Economic Aid for Latin American and African Countries PDF Format
- Citizens for Global Solutions Testimony submitted to the Senate
Armed Services Committee on the negative impact of BIAs
PDF Format - A Foreign Aid Bill Counterproductive to U.S. Foreign Policy PDF Format
- ESF Sanctions Hurt More Than They Help
PDF Format - Counterintuitive U.S. BIA Policy Expands
PDF Format
- U.S. Laws Regarding the ICC: Analysis
HTML Format | PDF Format - Summary of U.S. Policy on the ICC
HTML Format | PDF Format - Bush Administration policy statements on the ICC HTML Format
- Pro-ICC Quotes from U.S. Legislators HTML | PDF Format
- "Unsigning" the Rome Statute HTML Format
- UN Security Council Resolutions regarding the ICC HTML Format









