This site makes extensive use of JavaScript, for the best browsing experience we recommend you enable JavaScript in your browser.
The Global Citizen: Human Rights Council
If I were lucky enough to be able to select a couple of questions for tomorrow night's Presidential Debate at Hofstra, I would choose some questions that have not been beaten to death on the campaign trail so far. Whether or not these important issues are touched upon in the debates, here are the ones that I would want to make sure that the next leader of the free world weighed in on before I went to the polls:
One glaring omission so far is climate change. There is no doubt that the Earth is heating up; the ice caps are melting and drought is rampant, resulting in higher food prices globally. This issue has been every presidential debate cycle since 1984, but so far this time around, there has only been silence. Although the Democratic Party Platform did touch upon this issue as a national security concern, Obama has not said much since the Democratic Convention. On the other hand, the Republican Party's skepticism concerning the seriousness of climate change (I mean come on, Romney joked about it during his convention speech) casts a lot of doubt on their willingness to do something about it. If Romney is going to change his mind (which seems to be an effective campaign strategy), he needs to give the message enough time to reach voters.
Yesterday Citizens for Global Solutions joined human rights advocates from all over D.C. and the world for the 2011 Annual Human Rights Luncheon hosted by the United Nations Association of the National Capitol Area. Held in the beautiful Cannon House Caucus Room, the event was an inspiring reminder of what true dedication to a cause can produce - just in time for International Human Rights day this Saturday!
The luncheon was in honor of many long-time human rights advocates. The event paid tribute to Richard Griffs, an extremely active UNA-NCA member and the Chair of the Human Rights Committee, who sadly passed away earlier this week. He was the "force behind the Annual Human Rights Luncheon," and it was clear that he will be sorely missed both at the UNA-NCA and in the field of human rights.
Thomas Buergenthal, former Judge at both the International Court of Justice in The Hague and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights as well as Professor of Law at George Washington University School of Law, was honored for receiving the Louis B. Sohn Human Rights Award. He spoke of his personal experiences and relationship with Louis B. Sohn which was what made this day so special to him. Thomas met Louis in 1960 at Harvard Law School where he was working on his LL.M. degree, and "thus began a student-teacher relationship and friendship that lasted until his {Louis's} death in 2004."
2011 has been an incredible year for human rights. People worldwide, from the Arab Street to Wall Street, have taken an unprecedented stand for their basic human rights and dignity. That's why the United Nations has declared "Celebrate Human Rights" as the theme of the upcoming International Human Rights Day, commemorated this Saturday, December 10.
International Human Rights Day marks the creation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which was passed on this date in 1948. The declaration is accepted by virtually all nations and includes 30 articles that establish a broad range of essential rights that all people are entitled to. It happens to be the most translated document in the world, written in 382 languages. The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in Geneva and U.N. offices throughout the world are hosting events to celebrate the anniversary.
Navi Pillay, the High Commissioner for Human Rights, released a statement on the upcoming event, declaring that millions of individuals have "dusted off the promise of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and demanded 'freedom from fear and freedom from want.'" Thousands of people have marched, rallied, and occupied public spaces to demand that their voices be heard, empowering themselves against governments to which they have long been powerless.
The Arab Spring was a historical turning point for human rights, ushering in a new era where human rights are universally accepted as the basic foundation of successful governance. That was the message conveyed at a panel held last Friday at the Brookings Institute on "Human Rights and the Arab Awakening: Assessing the United Nations Response." Keynote speakers included Kyung-wha Kang, the Deputy High Commissioner for Human Rights, and Eileen Chamberlain Donahoe, the U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Human Rights Council. Both Deputy High Commissioner Kang and Ambassador Donahoe spoke about the Arab Spring as an occasion to truly cement human rights as the "third pillar" of the work of the U.N.
Deputy High Commissioner Kang spoke of Tunisia before the revolution as "model case" in international development, a nation on track to meet the Millennium Development Goals. But in all of the talk of positive economic development, many international officials ignored the continued lack of basic human rights and equality, leading to the widely unforeseen uprising that sparked revolution throughout the region. This is a clear example, in Kang's view, of why human rights must be a crucial component in development and humanitarian work throughout the world.
On Thursday, October 6, 2011 the International Center for Research on Women (ICRW) conducted the Insights to Action: Solutions to Child Marriage event highlighting an international crime issue that has been plaguing our global community for decades. Child marriage is a harmful traditional practice that denies 10 million girls a year their rights to health, education and security. Every day, more than 25,000 girls are married before they turn 18, with little if any say in the decision. That's 19 girls a minute denied their voice. Insights To action: Solutions to Child Marriage by the International Center for Research on Women exposed a problem swept under the rug by the global community for years. In recent years, national and international communities have begun to increasingly recognize child marriage as a serious issue, as it is a violation of girls' human rights and is a hindrance to key development outcomes. The highest rates of child marriage occur in India, West & North Africa, South Asia and Latin America.
For a long time child marriage was responded to solely through legislation. No, groups, no programs, no organizations. Legislation, as we know, moves as slow as molasses and by the time something "effective" is passed the violation of child's rights were the norm.
The House of Representatives took yet another regrettable step today to disengage the U.S. from the United Nations, as the House Foreign Affairs Committee (HFAC) voted to approve the "United Nations Transparency, Accountability, and Reform Act" by a 23 to 15 margin. The vote was along party lines, with Republicans on the committee supporting the bill and Democrats opposing it.
The United Nations Transparency, Accountability, and Reform Act, introduced in August by HFAC Chair Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL), is bad legislation in many ways. It would cut U.S. funding for the U.N.'s general budget in half if the United Nations does not enact a long series of reforms within a two-year time period. It would prohibit the U.S. from holding a seat on, or providing funding for, the Human Rights Council, where the U.S. has been using its influence to keep human rights violators such as Syria and Iran from obtaining seats. And it would establish a moratorium on new or expanded peacekeeping missions, at a time where instability around the globe means that the U.N. needs the flexibility to react to events and adjust its missions to protect civilians accordingly.
David Shorr, a program officer at the Stanley Foundation and co-editor of Bridging the Foreign Policy Divide project, wrote a blog on Care 2 yesterday about Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen's anti-U.N. bill. David quoted Citizens for Global Solution's Chief Executive Officer Don Kraus' apt sports analogy on the common sense of punishing the U.N. as an institution for the actions of some member states saying,
"But the main problem is this: it is an attempt to punish a diplomatic venue for a vote taking place there. Don captured the essential fallacy with the following sports analogy: 'Funding for the United Nations should not be cut based on the actions of some of its members. It’s like blaming Madison Square Garden for the Knicks losing a game.'"
The text of Ros-Lehtinen's outrageous bill can be viewed here. Stay tuned for more details we get closer to action being taken on the bill.
August is usually a quiet time in Washington, but not this year for those who advocate in support of the United Nations. On August 30th, House Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL) introduced the United Nations Transparency, Accountability, and Reform Act of 2011, a bill which threatens to undermine the United Nations by conditioning U.S. financial support on the U.N. meeting a number of reforms demanded by Republicans in Congress.
Chairwoman Ros-Lehtinen timed her introduction of the United Nations Transparency, Accountability, and Reform Act to come right before the U.N. General Assembly session in September, when a vote on Palestinian statehood is expected to occur. In doing so, she hopes to capitalize on American support for Israel in order to push through an anti-U.N. agenda she has long championed (she introduced the same bill in the previous Congress, with a few changes).
The bottom line is, this bill is bad legislation. It attempts to hold hostage the U.S. commitment to the U.N. and the international community based on a single vote in the General Assembly. But voting on controversial international issues is what the U.N. is designed to do-settling conflicts through votes rather than through wars. For the U.S. to threaten to withdraw its support and fail to pay its dues to the U.N. based on the outcome of a single U.N. vote is simply wrong, counterproductive, and hurts our ability to lead.
Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL), chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, introduced an extreme bill, H.R. 2829, that holds U.N. funding, as well as U.S. leadership, prestige, and influence at the U.N., hostage if her outrageous demands aren't met. Ros-Lehtinen is willing to sacrifice the benefits of U.S. leadership at the U.N. right at a time when the U.S. is successfully promoting its national security and foreign policy priorities on the world stage.
This is not the first time Rep. Ros-Lehtinen has introduced extreme anti-U.N. legislation. But this time she has strategically timed the debate on the bill to occur in September during the U.N. General Assembly's vote on the recognition of Palestine. Congresswoman Ros-Lehtinen is blatantly attempting to hijack Americans' support for Israel in the hopes of derailing the United States' relationship with the U.N. She is misusing and distorting the high emotions around the Palestine vote to promote her longstanding and extreme anti-U.N. agenda.
For the second time this year, the United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC) held a special session on Syria, adopting a resolution today condemning the ongoing violence and voting to send an independent international commission of inquiry into the country.
The resolution was adopted by the Council in a vote of 33 to 4, with 9 abstentions. Among other things, it:
- Strongly condemns grave and systematic human rights violations by the Syrian leaders;
- Welcomes the recent report of the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights on Syria and expresses profound concern about its findings; and
- Calls upon the Syrian authorities to immediately end all human rights violations and to protect their citizens.
The commission of inquiry would be sent to Syria to investigate all alleged human rights abuses which have occurred in the country since March. One of the goals of the commission's work would be to identify any perpetrators of abuses, including crimes against humanity, who would then be held accountable for their actions.
Russia and China both voted against the resolution. Russia claimed it was overly political and ignored positive steps taken by the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad; China stressed the importance of Syrian sovereignty in solving the country's problems. The two other HRC member countries to oppose the resolution were Cuba and Ecuador.
Pages
Topics
- Arms Control (22)
- Become a Member (3)
- Become a Member (1)
- Capitol Hill (164)
- CGS Political Action Committee (PAC) (17)
- Chapters (4)
- Civilian Protection (133)
- Climate Change (94)
- Comprehensive Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) (2)
- Congressional Report Card (7)
- Current Campaigns (8)
- Election News & Analysis (101)
- Fellows (2)
- Gender Based Violence (26)
- Genocide Prevention (113)
- Get Involved (68)
- Home (12)
- Human Rights (223)
- Human Rights Council (31)
- International Criminal Court (167)
- International Criminal Justice (51)
- Law & Justice (211)
- Law of the Sea Treaty (55)
- Nuclear Disarmament (81)
- Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) (2)
- Other (33)
- PAC: 2010 Election Endorsements (3)
- Partners for Global Change (2)
- Peacekeeping (104)
- Prevent War (181)
- Rights of the Child Treaty (10)
- Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) (19)
- Support Us (14)
- Take Action (24)
- Tax Deductible Giving (2)
- UN Funding (71)
- UN Reform & Revitalization (43)
- United Nations (321)
- usaforicc.org (1)
- WFI (5)
- Women's Rights Treaty (CEDAW) (47)
Archive
- May 2013 (5)
- April 2013 (10)
- March 2013 (6)
- February 2013 (16)
- January 2013 (12)
- December 2012 (4)
- November 2012 (11)
- October 2012 (11)
- September 2012 (7)
- August 2012 (3)
- July 2012 (17)
- June 2012 (23)
























