The Global Citizen

Search form

Category: Civilian Protection

Citizens for Global Solutions Quoted in "U.N. Security Council Fiddles While Syria Burns"

Protestor throws rock at a Syrian tank.

Citizens for Global Solutions CEO Don Kraus was quoted in an article by Thalif Deen of Inter Press Service on the lack of U.N. Security Council action on Syria.

Kraus was asked if the U.N. Security Council should move forward with a resolution on Syria, in light of veto threats from Russia and China. He said,

Don Kraus, chief executive officer of Citizens for Global Solutions, which has been closely monitoring the crisis in Syria, told IPS, "International cooperation is essential to resolve global challenges, building a safer, more secure world."

He said U.S. and other Security Council members should push a resolution with tough sanctions on the Assad regime.

Even if Russia or China chooses to veto this motion, he said, a strong majority vote by other Security Council members will send a clear message to President Assad and his cronies that they will inevitably face consequences for their actions.

While there is room for the Security Council to evaluate lessons learned from how the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) implemented the Responsibility to Protect in Libya, punishing unarmed protestors and innocent civilians in Syria is not an appropriate way for member states to address concerns, said Kraus.

"A vetoed resolution will allow member states to shame Russia, China, or any other permanent Security Council member that uses its veto privilege to protect perpetrators of mass atrocities," he said.

By doing so, he noted, they become just as guilty as those who pull the trigger.

Kraus also said that Security Council members have a choice. "Either they stop using the veto in situations dealing with mass atrocities, or they can maintain their status as controlling members of a body that will become increasingly irrelevant," he declared.

Libya and the Responsiblity to Protect

A guest blog post by Joe Schwartzberg:

The following op-ed is largely inspired two provocative and highly recommended essays. One, "Will Obama Denounce MLK as Memorial [Is] Dedicated?" by David Swanson, is excerpted and modified from his book, War Is a Lie (http://www.warisalie.org) and was transmitted to me by CGS Board member Dick Bernard. The other, "To the Shores of Tripoli," by a left wing, generally dovish Israeli journalist, Uri Avnery, was sent by John Sutter, a long-time President of the San Francisco-based Democratic World Federalists.

Early in his essay, cited above, Swanson quotes the following remarkable passage from President Obama's Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech.

"There will be times when nations -- acting individually or in concert -- will find the use of force not only necessary but morally justified. I make this statement mindful of what Martin Luther King Jr. said in this same ceremony years ago: 'Violence never brings permanent peace. It solves no social problem: it merely creates new and more complicated ones.'... But as a head of state sworn to protect and defend my nation, I cannot be guided by [King's and Gandhi's] examples alone. I face the world as it is, and cannot stand idle in the face of threats to the American people. For make no mistake: Evil does exist in the world. A non-violent movement could not have halted Hitler's armies. Negotiations cannot convince al Qaeda's leaders to lay down their arms. To say that force may sometimes be necessary is not a call to cynicism -- it is a recognition of history.... So yes, the instruments of war do have a role to play in preserving the peace."

In opposition to the President, Swanson argues as follows:

Lubanga Trial Closing Arguments Conclude

ICC Prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo

Today marked the final closing arguments in the trial of Thomas Lubanga Dyilo at the International Criminal Court (ICC).  Lubanga is charged by the ICC with conscripting child soldiers under the age of 15 into battle in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).

The defense made the argument that most of the soldiers recruited were overage, and when Lubanga discovered that some of them were under eighteen, he attempted to demobilize the underage soldiers; however, this process was difficult.  The defense asserted that the ICC "can't condemn" Lubanga, as he attempted to prevent child soldier use in the DRC.  Lubanga himself gave a statement at the end of the trial, in which he said that he was only attempting to "save life...in a spirit of reconciliation" and had taken action against conscription of minors.

The final verdict on the Lubanga case, which will mark the first completed trial in the ICC's history, is anticipated early in 2012.

Closing Arguments in ICC's Lubanga Trial Begin Today

Thomas Lubanga Dyilo

Today and tomorrow, the International Criminal Court (ICC) will be hearing closing arguments in the trial of Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, accused by the Court of conscripting child soldiers in battle in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).  This marks an important milestone for the Court: the long-awaited conclusion of the first completed trial since its creation.

Lubanga is alleged to be the founder of Union des Patriotes Congolais (UPC) and the Forces patriotiques pour la libération du Congo (FPLC); the former Commander-in-Chief of the FPLC, and president of the UPC.  He is charged with war crimes including enlisting and conscripting child soldiers under the age of 15 into the FPLC.  His trial began in January 2009.

The closing arguments are scheduled to wrap up tomorrow, and a verdict in the Lubanga case is expected early next year.

ICC or Libya, Who Should Try Gaddafi?

U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice Says Libya, ICC disagrees

U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice has stated that it should be up to the new Libyan National Transitional Government (NTC) whether Muammar Gaddafi, once captured, is tried by the International Criminal Court (ICC) in the Hague, or in Libya.  This seems to me to be a rather strange statement, and apparently the ICC thinks so too.

Ambassador Rice asserted in an interview with CNN that "This is something that must be decided not by the United States or any other government, but by the people of Libya and by the interim transitional government that we expect will soon be constituted.  These are all choices that the Libyan people will ultimately have to make for them."

But the ICC disagrees with Ambassador Rice.  Prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo reportedly has said that the Court, rather than Libyans, must make the decision on where Gaddafi and his fellow indictees will be tried.

The ICC opened its investigation into Libya after the situation was unanimously referred to the Court by the United Nations Security Council (UNSC).  The ICC issued arrest warrants on June 27th for Gaddafi, his son Saif Al-Islam Gaddafi and Abdullah Al-Sanousi, the Head of the Military Intelligence, for crimes against humanity after Prosecutor Ocampo's request was approved by the Court's Pre-Trial Chamber.  In order for a trial to be held in Libya instead of by the ICC, the principle of complementarity would have to be honored-in other words, the new government in Libya would have to show that it is both willing and able to try the defendants in their home country without ICC involvement.  Given the current state of the nation and its legal framework after four decades of Gaddafi's dictatorship, it seems unlikely to me that this standard could be met.

UN Human Rights Council Calls for Action on Syria

For the second time this year, the United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC) held a special session on Syria, adopting a resolution today condemning the ongoing violence and voting to send an independent international commission of inquiry into the country.

The resolution was adopted by the Council in a vote of 33 to 4, with 9 abstentions.  Among other things, it:

  1. Strongly condemns grave and systematic human rights violations by the Syrian leaders;
  2. Welcomes the recent report of the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights on Syria and expresses profound concern about its findings; and
  3. Calls upon the Syrian authorities to immediately end all human rights violations and to protect their citizens.

The commission of inquiry would be sent to Syria to investigate all alleged human rights abuses which have occurred in the country since March.  One of the goals of the commission's work would be to identify any perpetrators of abuses, including crimes against humanity, who would then be held accountable for their actions.

Russia and China both voted against the resolution. Russia claimed it was overly political and ignored positive steps taken by the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad; China stressed the importance of Syrian sovereignty in solving the country's problems.  The two other HRC member countries to oppose the resolution were Cuba and Ecuador.

Libya Update: Saif Gaddafi Still At Large

Saif Gaddafi

A day after the Libyan National Transitional Council (TNC) claimed it had captured Saif Gaddafi--son of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi who, like his father, is wanted by the ICC on charges of crimes against humanity--Saif appeared this morning to refute this story and currently remains at large.  Meantime, fighting continues in Tripoli between rebel and pro-Gaddafi forces.  CGS will continue to provide updates on Libya as events unfold.

Libya: The latest on the Gaddafis

Celebrations in Libya

As fighting continues today in Tripoli between rebels and Gaddafi loyalists, it appears that the rebel forces are moving closer to fully securing control of the capital city.  One big piece of news that has emerged from the chaos is that Saif Gaddafi, son of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi--who is, like his father, wanted by the International Criminal Court (ICC)-has been captured by the National Transitional Council (NTC).  So, what happens now?

ICC Prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo has confirmed that the NTC has captured Saif Gaddafi and put him under house arrest.  Ocampo is now speaking with the NTC about transferring Saif into ICC custody, so he can ultimately face charges issued against him by the Court for crimes committed in Libya.

Muammar Gaddafi's own whereabouts are still a mystery but he, too, faces an ICC arrest warrant for the violence he has unleashed on civilians in his country since February.  If Gaddafi attempts to flee Libya to find safe haven elsewhere, any ICC country on whose soil he steps foot is obligated to turn him over to the Court.  It is of urgent importance that all ICC state parties honor this commitment.

The situation in Libya remains in flux, but hopefully the end of the Gaddafi family's hold on Libya can be achieved with no further violence targeting innocent civilians, who have already suffered greatly under the regime.  I hope to see both strong efforts to protect civilians during the power transfer-perhaps the National Transitional Council inviting in UN peacekeeping forces to help with this-and at long last, justice for all those Libyans who suffered at the hands of the Gaddafis.

Syria: Who You Gonna Call?

Syrian Protestors Burn a Picture of President Bashir Al-Assad

It has been a busy week for those of us following the situation in Syria. At the beginning of the week Syrian President Bashir Al-Assad upped the ante of his reign of terror by turning gunships on residents of a coastal town. Just today, President Obama made a bold move in telling Assad to step down from power and let the Syrian people decide their future. I wrote an op-ed discussing these developments, as well as suggestions for future United Nations Security Council action, featured on the Care 2 website.

Here is the full text of the op-ed:

In Syria, blood is being hosed off of the streets. Gunship strikes terrorize unarmed protestors in the coastal town of Latakia.  The L.A. Times quotes a Syrian student saying "Entire buildings are being shelled with heavy artillery. The bodies stay on the streets because we are unable to leave our home and get them... The smell of death is around us."

As Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's brutality escalates, so have the rebukes from the world community. Today President Obama announced the harshest financial sanctions yet against the Assad regime.  And for the first time, the president has called for Assad to leave Syria, so the country can have a democratic transition. Obama said, "What the United States will support is an effort to bring about a Syria that is democratic, just, and inclusive for all Syrians."

Bahrain, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia have recalled their ambassadors. The Saudi king has declared, "The future of Syria lies between two options: either Syria chooses willingly to resort to reason, or face being swept into deep chaos."

Obama Calls on Syrian President Assad to Step Down

Syrian President Bashar al-Assad

President Obama took his boldest step yet in addressing the violent crackdown in Syria today, calling on Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to leave office.

"The future of Syria must be determined by its people, but President Bashar al-Assad is standing in their way. His calls for dialogue and reform have rung hollow while he is imprisoning, torturing, and slaughtering his own people.  We have consistently said that President Assad must lead a democratic transition or get out of the way.  He has not led.  For the sake of the Syrian people, the time has come for President Assad to step aside," Obama said in a statement released this morning.

Obama's call for Assad to step down comes after months of protests in which approximately 2,000 Syrians have been killed.  Additionally, Obama issued an executive order which prohibits U.S. persons from investing in Syria; bans imports of Syrian petroleum; and blocks the property of the Syrian government.  To read the full executive order, click here.

Obama's call for Assad's resignation is a welcome development.  The Syrian leader has for months now engaged in brutal attacks on his own citizens, targeting civilian protesters and killing thousands for speaking out against his regime.  He needs to go.