This site makes extensive use of JavaScript, for the best browsing experience we recommend you enable JavaScript in your browser.
The Global Citizen: Aggression
I just published this oped on the Huffington Post:
Our nation is blessed with a conscience that demands an end to unjust wars. During the wars in Vietnam and Iraq, tens of thousands of protesters chanted in the streets, crashed the phone system of Congress, and creatively made their collective shout of "No More War" heard.
By: Ariela Blätter
Another first was on Monday when Chairman Wenaweser, current UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon and former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan kicked off the opening plenary. The Chairman reminded the delegates, that although state parties were here to 'amend' the Rome Statute, it was in fact a solid treaty that already guides the Court and does not need significant change. This likely referred to his views on two main focuses of the Conference, the first being taking stock of the Court’s progress and the crime of aggression. The process of stocktaking essentially comprises a conversation among delegates and civil society about the Court and international justice, while the crime of aggression, which is technically contained in the Statute, needs text added to become operational. In conclusion of his remarks, he made a pitch for states to pledge their commitment to giving money, time and/or resources to the ICC.
By: Ariela Blätter
The first week was a whirlwind in Kampala at the 2010 Review Conference for the International Criminal Court (ICC). Descending on the Ugandan capital last week was a crowd estimated at 2000 or so members of State Parties to the Rome Statute, non-state parties and members of civil society. Delegates from all over the world have come to discuss the revision of the Rome Statute. The choice to host the event in Uganda has borne fruit in a large representation of African delegates and NGO representatives. Technically, at issue at the Review Conference is the process of amending Article 124, a transitional provision which allows states to basically 'opt out' of war crimes for period of seven years after ratification. Other business that is heavily occupying the proceedings is the crime of aggression, the so-called 'Belgian proposal' on war crimes and the process of taking stock of the International Criminal Court's progress.
Topics
- Arms Control (21)
- Become a Member (8)
- Capitol Hill (180)
- CGS Political Action Committee (PAC) (14)
- Chapters (5)
- Civilian Protection (211)
- Climate Change (81)
- Comprehensive Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) (3)
- Congressional Report Card (9)
- Current Campaigns (8)
- Election News & Analysis (103)
- Fellows (2)
- Gender Based Violence (21)
- Genocide Prevention (172)
- Get Involved (70)
- Home (4)
- Human Rights (274)
- Human Rights Council (50)
- International Criminal Court (312)
- International Criminal Justice (74)
- Law & Justice (319)
- Law of the Sea Treaty (59)
- Nuclear Disarmament (81)
- Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) (3)
- Other (44)
- PAC: 2010 Election Endorsements (3)
- Partners for Global Change (3)
- Peacekeeping (154)
- Prevent War (200)
- Rights of the Child Treaty (11)
- Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) (23)
- Support Us (7)
- Take Action (36)
- Tax Deductible Giving (3)
- UN Funding (118)
- UN Reform & Revitalization (52)
- United Nations (398)
- usaforicc.org (2)
- WFI (2)
- Women's Rights Treaty (CEDAW) (51)
Archive
- May 2012 (20)
- April 2012 (36)
- March 2012 (34)
- February 2012 (24)
- January 2012 (30)
- December 2011 (36)
- November 2011 (64)
- October 2011 (38)
- September 2011 (40)
- August 2011 (36)
- July 2011 (62)
- June 2011 (66)












