This site makes extensive use of JavaScript, for the best browsing experience we recommend you enable JavaScript in your browser.
Russia, China Support Assad instead of Syrians - Again
It's hardly surprising at the point, but no less sad and infuriating. Once again, Russia and China have used their permanent veto-wielding power on the U.N. Security Council to protect Syrian President Bashar al-Assad rather than the citizens his regime continues to butcher.
In another double-veto today, Russia and China voted against a Security Council resolution which would have threatened the Syrian regime with sanctions in an effort to end the bloodshed there which has gone on for more than a year and killed at least 14,000 civilians. It's not the first time Russia and China have vetoed efforts to stop Syria's crimes against its people; they've been standing in staunch opposition to any such action by the international community for months now. And whether it's the result of Russia's ties to the Assad regime, a belief that the U.N.-approved campaign in Libya last year overreached its mandate, or the fear of what message international efforts in Syria might send to their own restive populations at home, ultimately means very little.
What matters is that the Syrian peace process continues to fail, and two-fifths of the Security Council continues to shield a tyrant and international pariah who happens to be a head of state.
Given the rapid-fire pace of recent events in Syria, with the killing of several top-level government officials by rebels this week, it is possible that the Assad regime may not last much longer anyway. But whatever the outcome, Russia and China's behavior in this situation has been outrageous. As permanent Security Council members, they should be living up to their responsibility to protect innocent victims of genocide who cannot protect themselves. Instead, they continue to prioritize protecting Assad and his cronies. It's a deplorable state of affairs, any way you look at it.
About the author
Melissa Kaplan
Deputy Director of Government Relations
Topics
- Arms Control (22)
- Become a Member (3)
- Become a Member (1)
- Capitol Hill (164)
- CGS Political Action Committee (PAC) (17)
- Chapters (4)
- Civilian Protection (133)
- Climate Change (94)
- Comprehensive Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) (2)
- Congressional Report Card (7)
- Current Campaigns (8)
- Election News & Analysis (101)
- Fellows (2)
- Gender Based Violence (26)
- Genocide Prevention (113)
- Get Involved (68)
- Home (12)
- Human Rights (223)
- Human Rights Council (31)
- International Criminal Court (167)
- International Criminal Justice (51)
- Law & Justice (211)
- Law of the Sea Treaty (55)
- Nuclear Disarmament (81)
- Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) (2)
- Other (33)
- PAC: 2010 Election Endorsements (3)
- Partners for Global Change (2)
- Peacekeeping (104)
- Prevent War (181)
- Rights of the Child Treaty (10)
- Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) (19)
- Support Us (14)
- Take Action (24)
- Tax Deductible Giving (2)
- UN Funding (71)
- UN Reform & Revitalization (43)
- United Nations (321)
- usaforicc.org (1)
- WFI (5)
- Women's Rights Treaty (CEDAW) (47)
Archive
- May 2013 (5)
- April 2013 (10)
- March 2013 (6)
- February 2013 (16)
- January 2013 (12)
- December 2012 (4)
- November 2012 (11)
- October 2012 (11)
- September 2012 (7)
- August 2012 (3)
- July 2012 (17)
- June 2012 (23)









Comments
Russian and China's actions
Russian and China's actions weaken the UN system and make it less relevant. It's time to have a broad conversation about how to delegitimize using violence as a way to create political change. In the meantime the US should push the Arab League to pass a resolution that will allow for the protection of Syrian civilians.
'Anonymous', your response to
'Anonymous', your response to this story is nonsensical. On the one hand you accuse the Soviet and Chinese governments of making the UN 'less relevant' via their support of the Assad government which, I might add, they are perfectly entitled to do, whilst suggesting that 'the US should push the Arab League...' (i.e. bypass the UN altogether).
Do you like it when the United States takes it upon itself to act 'unilaterally'? Endless examples: El Salvador, Nicaragua, Yugoslavia, Vietnam, Iraq, Granada...
Russian and China's actions
Russian and China's actions weaken the UN system and make it less relevant. It's time to have a broad conversation about how to delegitimize using violence as a way to create political change. In the meantime the US should push the Arab League to pass a resolution that will allow for the protection of Syrian civilians.